AbstractThis study aimed to describe the ideology of: (a) journalists, (b) politicians, and (c) observers/community in framing President Joko Widodo in Suara Merdeka, Kompas, andRepublika daily newspapers. The data sources were the three newspapers published in2016. The data were collected through: (a) literature study, (b) discourse analysis, and(c) in-depth interviews with linguists and mass media experts. The data analysis wascarried out using Pan and Kosicki's framing analysis model. The results show that thereare ideological differences among the three media in framing President Joko Widodo. Thedifferences are manifested in the aspects of: (a) syntax, (b) script, (c) theme, and (d) rhetoric.The three media also differ in presenting: (a) news schemes, (b) news completeness, (c)details, (d) lexicon, and (e) completeness of 5W + 1H elements in reporting PresidentJoko Widodo.Keywords: frame, ideology, media, framing analysis
This community service activities was designed to (1) give a critical evaluation of the concept and implementation of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) and Courses on Character Development (Mata Kuliah Pengembangan Kepribadian/MPK) at universities in contemporary Indonesia and (2) to design an appropriate model of implementation of ESD concept for improving the quality of MPK program. The methods on this study are literature studies, workshop on instrument design, Focus Group Discussion (FGD), implementation of ESD concept in co-curricular activities, and evaluation. The program will be held in Center for Pancasila Studies (PSP-UGM), at Taman Makam Pahlawan Kusumanegara, Pakem Orphanage center, and scavengers community in Condongcatur. The expected results of the program are (1) a critical note on the concept and implementation of ESD and MPK at universities in Indonesia and (2) a model and module of implementation of ESD PLUS through Training Kader Bangsa (TKB) which are more adaptable and appropriate with the local genius of Indonesia.
ABSTRACTThe Resilience of Pancasila Ideology had ups and downs conditions. Its could not be separated from the efforts and phenomenon in the society. That phenomenon caused the relisilience of Pancasila ideology be strengthened or weakened. Moreover, the condition of Indonesia was experiencing ideological problems right now. This paper decribed about the importance of the resilience of Pancasila ideology in supporting to national resilience, what were the factors that weakened and strengthened the resilience of Pancasila ideology, and what efforts should be made to strengthened the resilience of Pancasila ideology. The methods used in this research were field research and library research, namely interview, FGD, survey, and literature review. This research also briefly described about the instrument of Pancasila Ideology Index (IKIP). The main aspects measured in IKIP were divinity, humanity, unity, popularness, and social justice. The indicators of IKIP were politics, nationality, social, cultural, religious and economic. This article was written and based on research for two years (2017-2018) conducted in nine provinces in Indonesia. Namely: Manokwari (West Papua), Ambon (Maluku), Kupang (East Nusa Tenggara), Denpasar (Bali), Makassar (South Sulawesi), Medan (North Sumatra), Pontianak (West Kalimantan), Yogyakarta (Yogyakarta Special Region), and Jakarta. The location was chosen and based on the level of heterogeneity (religion, ethnicity, and culture). Sampling method used multi-stage random sampling.This article also described the portrait of resilience of Pancasila ideology in the nine (9) cities of IndonesiaABSTRAKKetahanan Ideologi Pancasila mengalami pasang surut. Hal ini tidak terlepas dari adanya upaya dan kejadian dalam masyarakat yang membuat ketahanan ideologi Pancasila menguat atau melemah, baik secara sengaja maupun di luar kesengajaan. Terkait dengan kondisi Indonesia saat ini yang tengah mengalami problematika ideologis, 278 Jurnal Ketahanan Nasional, Vol. 25, No. 2, Agustus 2019: 277-294 penelitian ini sangat diperlukan untuk mengkaji pentingnya ketahanan ideologi Pancasila dalam mendukung ketahanan nasional; apa saja faktor yang memperkuat dan memperlemah ketahanan ideologi Pancasila; serta upaya apa saja yang bisa dilakukan untuk meningkatkan ketahanan ideologi Pancasila. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian lapangan dan pustaka, di antaranya wawancara, FGD, survei, dan kajian pustaka. Penelitian ini juga menjelaskan secara ringkas instrument Indeks Ideologi (IKIP). Aspek utama yang diukur dalam IKIP ini adalah ketuhanan, kemanusiaan, persatuan, kerakyatan, dan keadilan sosial. Pada setiap aspek dikategorsasikan lagi ke dalam indikator-indikator yaitu yaitu politik, kenegaraan-kebangsaan, sosial, kebudayaan, keagamaan, dan ekonomi. Artikel ini ditulis berdasarkan penelitian selama dua tahun (2017-2018) pada sembilan provinsi di Indonesia, yaitu Manokwari (Papua Barat), Ambon (Maluku), Kupang (NTT), Denpasar (Bali), Makassar ( Sulawesi Selatan), Pontianak (Kalimantan Barat), Yogyakarta (DIY), Jakarta (DKI Jakarta), dan Medan (Sumatera Utara). Pemilihan lokasi berdasarkan tingkat heterogenitas agama, suku, dan budaya. Metode penentuan lokasi survei menggunakan multi-stage random sampling. Pada akhir artikel ini juga dipaparkan hasil pengukuran tingkat ketahanan ideologi Pancasila pada sembilan lokasi tersebut.
